Ohadn/blake2s last block opcode vm #1932

ohad-nir-starkware · 2025-01-29T14:39:15Z

Blake2sLastBlock opcode runner

Description

Adding the opcode Blake2sLastBlock to the VM.
Expects op0 to be a pointer to a sequence of 9 felts and and op1 to be a pointer to a sequence of 16 felts.
Said felts should represent u32 integers, i.e. have value of at most 2**32-1.
The first 8 felts of op0 represent a state, the 9th represents the counter and the 10th represents counter+n_bytes i.e. the total length of the entire message.
The 16 felts of op1 represent a message.
The "output" consists of 8 felts representing u32 numbers of the Blake2s compression of the last block.
dst should be a pointer, it points to a sequence of 8 cells which each should either be uninitialised or already contain a value matching that of the output at the same index.
The opcode inserts the aforementioned output into the 8 cells [dst], [dst+1], ... [dst+7] (and yields an error if one of said cells already contains a value differing from the output).

Currently Blake2sLastBlock has opcode_num 16, meaning encoded_instr is expanded to 128 bits with the 63 most significant bits expected to be 0 (otherwise yield an error).

The motivation is that it has been decided at Starkware that Blake2sLastBlock is to be implemented at an opcode, thus it needs to be supported by the runner.

Checklist

Linked to Github Issue
Unit tests added
Integration tests added.
This change requires new documentation.
- Documentation has been added/updated.
- CHANGELOG has been updated.

This change is

github-actions · 2025-01-29T14:49:42Z

**Hyper Thereading Benchmark results**




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     27.999 s ±  0.010 s    [User: 27.246 s, System: 0.750 s]
  Range (min … max):   27.992 s … 28.005 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     27.341 s ±  0.024 s    [User: 26.576 s, System: 0.762 s]
  Range (min … max):   27.324 s … 27.358 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 1 ran
    1.02 ± 0.00 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 1




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     15.544 s ±  0.020 s    [User: 27.414 s, System: 0.782 s]
  Range (min … max):   15.530 s … 15.558 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     15.273 s ±  0.085 s    [User: 26.765 s, System: 0.775 s]
  Range (min … max):   15.213 s … 15.334 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 2 ran
    1.02 ± 0.01 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 2




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     11.239 s ±  0.017 s    [User: 41.180 s, System: 0.917 s]
  Range (min … max):   11.227 s … 11.251 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.772 s ±  0.303 s    [User: 40.158 s, System: 0.925 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.558 s … 10.987 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 4 ran
    1.04 ± 0.03 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 4




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):     11.234 s ±  0.055 s    [User: 40.729 s, System: 0.927 s]
  Range (min … max):   11.195 s … 11.272 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.852 s ±  0.114 s    [User: 39.486 s, System: 0.939 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.771 s … 10.932 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 6 ran
    1.04 ± 0.01 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 6




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):     11.120 s ±  0.210 s    [User: 41.344 s, System: 0.941 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.971 s … 11.269 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.755 s ±  0.082 s    [User: 39.941 s, System: 0.969 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.697 s … 10.812 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 8 ran
    1.03 ± 0.02 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 8




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):     11.248 s ±  0.115 s    [User: 41.511 s, System: 1.007 s]
  Range (min … max):   11.167 s … 11.329 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.896 s ±  0.212 s    [User: 40.424 s, System: 1.037 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.746 s … 11.046 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 16 ran
    1.03 ± 0.02 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 16

github-actions · 2025-01-29T15:01:17Z

Benchmark Results for unmodified programs 🚀

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
`base big_factorial`	2.187 ± 0.017	2.173	2.229	1.00
`head big_factorial`	2.213 ± 0.033	2.183	2.276	1.01 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
`base big_fibonacci`	2.150 ± 0.023	2.127	2.197	1.00
`head big_fibonacci`	2.156 ± 0.019	2.136	2.198	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
`base blake2s_integration_benchmark`	7.963 ± 0.028	7.925	7.998	1.00
`head blake2s_integration_benchmark`	8.254 ± 0.079	8.069	8.342	1.04 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
`base compare_arrays_200000`	2.260 ± 0.016	2.239	2.292	1.00
`head compare_arrays_200000`	2.292 ± 0.037	2.260	2.391	1.01 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
`base dict_integration_benchmark`	1.494 ± 0.012	1.485	1.527	1.00 ± 0.01
`head dict_integration_benchmark`	1.487 ± 0.009	1.478	1.507	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
`base field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark`	1.271 ± 0.010	1.258	1.295	1.00
`head field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark`	1.295 ± 0.018	1.286	1.345	1.02 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
`base integration_builtins`	8.035 ± 0.061	7.895	8.090	1.00
`head integration_builtins`	8.343 ± 0.119	8.129	8.590	1.04 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
`base keccak_integration_benchmark`	8.288 ± 0.075	8.213	8.423	1.00
`head keccak_integration_benchmark`	8.507 ± 0.121	8.361	8.686	1.03 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
`base linear_search`	2.232 ± 0.013	2.216	2.252	1.00
`head linear_search`	2.260 ± 0.014	2.242	2.293	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
`base math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark`	1.568 ± 0.007	1.559	1.583	1.01 ± 0.01
`head math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark`	1.556 ± 0.009	1.549	1.580	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
`base math_integration_benchmark`	1.538 ± 0.013	1.527	1.570	1.02 ± 0.01
`head math_integration_benchmark`	1.507 ± 0.007	1.498	1.523	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
`base memory_integration_benchmark`	1.251 ± 0.004	1.245	1.258	1.00
`head memory_integration_benchmark`	1.254 ± 0.005	1.251	1.266	1.00 ± 0.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
`base operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks`	1.648 ± 0.014	1.629	1.670	1.01 ± 0.01
`head operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks`	1.629 ± 0.007	1.617	1.641	1.00

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
`base pedersen`	544.8 ± 3.4	541.8	553.9	1.00 ± 0.01
`head pedersen`	544.8 ± 1.6	542.0	546.6	1.00

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
`base poseidon_integration_benchmark`	637.0 ± 9.0	630.4	655.1	1.01 ± 0.01
`head poseidon_integration_benchmark`	631.7 ± 2.5	628.4	635.6	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
`base secp_integration_benchmark`	1.902 ± 0.010	1.889	1.926	1.00 ± 0.01
`head secp_integration_benchmark`	1.895 ± 0.013	1.879	1.922	1.00

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
`base set_integration_benchmark`	639.1 ± 1.6	637.1	641.9	1.01 ± 0.00
`head set_integration_benchmark`	635.7 ± 1.1	633.5	637.2	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
`base uint256_integration_benchmark`	4.432 ± 0.046	4.373	4.512	1.00
`head uint256_integration_benchmark`	4.488 ± 0.041	4.426	4.532	1.01 ± 0.01

codecov · 2025-01-29T15:11:33Z

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 97.95918% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 96.39%. Comparing base (153d3a8) to head (cee3133).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
vm/src/vm/vm_core.rs	97.67%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1932   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.39%   96.39%           
=======================================
  Files         102      102           
  Lines       41483    41566   +83     
=======================================
+ Hits        39987    40068   +81     
- Misses       1496     1498    +2

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

DavidLevitGurevich

Reviewed 1 of 9 files at r1, 4 of 4 files at r6, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 4 unresolved discussions (waiting on @fmoletta, @gabrielbosio, @igaray, @juanbono, @Oppen, @pefontana, and @YairVaknin-starkware)

cairo_programs/stwo_exclusive_programs/blake2s_opcode_test.cairo line 138 at r6 (raw file):

    let offset1 = (2**15)-4;
    let offset2 = (2**15)-3;
    static_assert dst == [fp -5];

space after the -

cairo_programs/stwo_exclusive_programs/blake2s_opcode_test.cairo line 161 at r6 (raw file):

    let flag_num = flag_dst_base_fp+flag_op0_base_fp*(2**1)+flag_op1_imm*(2**2)+flag_op1_base_fp*(2**3);
    let blake2s_opcode_extension_num = 1;
    let blake2s_last_block_opcode_extension_num =2;

missing space

cairo_programs/stwo_exclusive_programs/blake2s_opcode_test.cairo line 167 at r6 (raw file):

    static_assert blake2s_last_block_instruction_num==18449981025204076539;

    // Write the instruction to [pc] and point [ap+1] to the designated output.

how did the +1 pop up? if the reason is hidden in the if statement I would replace it with the plane jmp syntax

ohad-nir-starkware

Reviewable status: 2 of 11 files reviewed, 4 unresolved discussions (waiting on @DavidLevitGurevich, @fmoletta, @gabrielbosio, @igaray, @juanbono, @Oppen, @pefontana, and @YairVaknin-starkware)

cairo_programs/stwo_exclusive_programs/blake2s_opcode_test.cairo line 138 at r6 (raw file):

Previously, DavidLevitGurevich wrote…

space after the -

Done.

cairo_programs/stwo_exclusive_programs/blake2s_opcode_test.cairo line 161 at r6 (raw file):

Previously, DavidLevitGurevich wrote…

missing space

Done.

cairo_programs/stwo_exclusive_programs/blake2s_opcode_test.cairo line 167 at r6 (raw file):

Previously, DavidLevitGurevich wrote…

how did the +1 pop up? if the reason is hidden in the if statement I would replace it with the plane jmp syntax

Done.

DavidLevitGurevich

Reviewed 3 of 9 files at r7.
Reviewable status: 5 of 11 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @fmoletta, @gabrielbosio, @igaray, @juanbono, @Oppen, @pefontana, and @YairVaknin-starkware)

DavidLevitGurevich

Reviewable status: 5 of 11 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @fmoletta, @gabrielbosio, @igaray, @juanbono, @Oppen, @pefontana, and @YairVaknin-starkware)

DavidLevitGurevich

Reviewed 3 of 3 files at r8, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: 7 of 11 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @fmoletta, @gabrielbosio, @igaray, @juanbono, @Oppen, @pefontana, and @YairVaknin-starkware)

gabrielbosio · 2025-02-17T14:00:31Z

vm/src/vm/vm_core.rs

+            &message,
+            counter,
+            0,
+            if !is_last_block { 0 } else { 0xffffffff },


Please extract this logic into a variable next to the definitions of state and message (lines 481-497)

gabrielbosio · 2025-02-17T14:05:03Z

vm/src/vm/decoding/decoder.rs

+    if (opcode_extension == OpcodeExtension::Blake
+        || opcode_extension == OpcodeExtension::BlakeFinalize)
+        && (opcode != Opcode::NOp
+            || (op1_addr != Op1Addr::FP && op1_addr != Op1Addr::AP)
+            || res != Res::Op1
+            || pc_update != PcUpdate::Regular
+            || (ap_update_num != 0 && ap_update_num != 2))
+    {


I would extract these conditionals into a variable to separate the opcode_extension checks of the flags check. Something like:

Suggested change

if (opcode_extension == OpcodeExtension::Blake

|| opcode_extension == OpcodeExtension::BlakeFinalize)

&& (opcode != Opcode::NOp

|| (op1_addr != Op1Addr::FP && op1_addr != Op1Addr::AP)

|| res != Res::Op1

|| pc_update != PcUpdate::Regular

|| (ap_update_num != 0 && ap_update_num != 2))

{

let are_blake_flags_invalid = opcode != Opcode::NOp

|| (op1_addr != Op1Addr::FP && op1_addr != Op1Addr::AP)

|| res != Res::Op1

|| pc_update != PcUpdate::Regular

|| (ap_update_num != 0 && ap_update_num != 2;

if (opcode_extension == OpcodeExtension::Blake

|| opcode_extension == OpcodeExtension::BlakeFinalize)

&& are_opcodes_flags_invalid)

{

ohad-nir-starkware

Reviewable status: 5 of 11 files reviewed, 3 unresolved discussions (waiting on @DavidLevitGurevich, @fmoletta, @gabrielbosio, @igaray, @juanbono, @Oppen, @pefontana, @YairVaknin-starkware, and @yuvalsw)

ohad-nir-starkware · 2025-02-17T15:25:47Z

vm/src/vm/vm_core.rs

+            &message,
+            counter,
+            0,
+            if !is_last_block { 0 } else { 0xffffffff },


ohad-nir-starkware · 2025-02-17T15:25:47Z

vm/src/vm/decoding/decoder.rs

+    if (opcode_extension == OpcodeExtension::Blake
+        || opcode_extension == OpcodeExtension::BlakeFinalize)
+        && (opcode != Opcode::NOp
+            || (op1_addr != Op1Addr::FP && op1_addr != Op1Addr::AP)
+            || res != Res::Op1
+            || pc_update != PcUpdate::Regular
+            || (ap_update_num != 0 && ap_update_num != 2))
+    {


DavidLevitGurevich

Reviewed 3 of 9 files at r7, 2 of 3 files at r9, 2 of 2 files at r10, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: 10 of 11 files reviewed, 3 unresolved discussions (waiting on @fmoletta, @gabrielbosio, @igaray, @juanbono, @Oppen, @pefontana, @YairVaknin-starkware, and @yuvalsw)

ohad-nir-starkware self-assigned this Jan 29, 2025

ohad-nir-starkware requested review from igaray, Oppen, fmoletta, juanbono, pefontana and gabrielbosio as code owners January 29, 2025 14:39

ohad-nir-starkware changed the base branch from main to ohadn/blake2s_opcode_runner January 29, 2025 14:48

ohad-nir-starkware force-pushed the ohadn/blake2s_last_block_opcode_VM branch from bcf7dc5 to 4919048 Compare January 29, 2025 16:43

ohad-nir-starkware requested a review from YairVaknin-starkware January 29, 2025 16:44

ohad-nir-starkware force-pushed the ohadn/blake2s_opcode_runner branch 2 times, most recently from 2ce852d to d25cef1 Compare January 31, 2025 13:01

ohad-nir-starkware force-pushed the ohadn/blake2s_last_block_opcode_VM branch from 4919048 to 0260570 Compare January 31, 2025 13:05

ohad-nir-starkware force-pushed the ohadn/blake2s_opcode_runner branch 2 times, most recently from 1c031e4 to de91ec1 Compare February 3, 2025 19:44

ohad-nir-starkware mentioned this pull request Feb 3, 2025

implement Blake2s opcode in runner #1927

Merged

6 tasks

ohad-nir-starkware force-pushed the ohadn/blake2s_opcode_runner branch 9 times, most recently from b26563b to 246904f Compare February 5, 2025 08:03

ohad-nir-starkware force-pushed the ohadn/blake2s_last_block_opcode_VM branch from 0260570 to 7b7d956 Compare February 5, 2025 11:56

ohad-nir-starkware force-pushed the ohadn/blake2s_opcode_runner branch from 246904f to 4490aab Compare February 5, 2025 12:49

ohad-nir-starkware force-pushed the ohadn/blake2s_opcode_runner branch from 4a7be69 to 62c28ae Compare February 11, 2025 19:25

DavidLevitGurevich reviewed Feb 11, 2025

View reviewed changes

ohad-nir-starkware force-pushed the ohadn/blake2s_opcode_runner branch from 62c28ae to 4f2ec51 Compare February 12, 2025 07:58

ohad-nir-starkware force-pushed the ohadn/blake2s_last_block_opcode_VM branch from 0e3fb2c to 330f44d Compare February 12, 2025 08:03

ohad-nir-starkware force-pushed the ohadn/blake2s_opcode_runner branch from 4f2ec51 to 261b2f7 Compare February 12, 2025 10:11

ohad-nir-starkware force-pushed the ohadn/blake2s_last_block_opcode_VM branch 2 times, most recently from d707312 to 2190f0d Compare February 12, 2025 11:56

ohad-nir-starkware commented Feb 12, 2025

View reviewed changes

DavidLevitGurevich reviewed Feb 12, 2025

View reviewed changes

ohad-nir-starkware changed the base branch from ohadn/blake2s_opcode_runner to main February 12, 2025 18:06

ohad-nir-starkware force-pushed the ohadn/blake2s_last_block_opcode_VM branch from 2190f0d to 2a632d3 Compare February 12, 2025 20:07

DavidLevitGurevich reviewed Feb 12, 2025

View reviewed changes

ohad-nir-starkware force-pushed the ohadn/blake2s_last_block_opcode_VM branch 2 times, most recently from d0711e3 to c52927b Compare February 15, 2025 08:24

ohad-nir-starkware requested a review from yuvalsw as a code owner February 15, 2025 08:24

ohad-nir-starkware force-pushed the ohadn/blake2s_last_block_opcode_VM branch 3 times, most recently from 63e63fa to b330037 Compare February 15, 2025 12:55

gabrielbosio requested changes Feb 17, 2025

View reviewed changes

implement Blake2sLastBlock opcode in runner

cee3133

ohad-nir-starkware force-pushed the ohadn/blake2s_last_block_opcode_VM branch from b330037 to cee3133 Compare February 17, 2025 15:23

ohad-nir-starkware commented Feb 17, 2025

View reviewed changes

JulianGCalderon approved these changes Feb 17, 2025

View reviewed changes

gabrielbosio approved these changes Feb 17, 2025

View reviewed changes

gabrielbosio added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 17, 2025

DavidLevitGurevich reviewed Feb 17, 2025

View reviewed changes

Merged via the queue into main with commit abe5f44 Feb 17, 2025
93 checks passed

gabrielbosio deleted the ohadn/blake2s_last_block_opcode_VM branch February 17, 2025 19:23

Ohadn/blake2s last block opcode vm #1932

Ohadn/blake2s last block opcode vm #1932

Uh oh!

Conversation

ohad-nir-starkware commented Jan 29, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Blake2sLastBlock opcode runner

Description

Checklist

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Jan 29, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Jan 29, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

codecov bot commented Jan 29, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

DavidLevitGurevich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

ohad-nir-starkware left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

DavidLevitGurevich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

DavidLevitGurevich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

DavidLevitGurevich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

gabrielbosio Feb 17, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

ohad-nir-starkware Feb 17, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

gabrielbosio Feb 17, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

ohad-nir-starkware Feb 17, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

ohad-nir-starkware left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

ohad-nir-starkware Feb 17, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

ohad-nir-starkware Feb 17, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

DavidLevitGurevich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

ohad-nir-starkware commented Jan 29, 2025 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Jan 29, 2025 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Jan 29, 2025 •

edited

Loading

codecov bot commented Jan 29, 2025 •

edited

Loading